New York City Intersection Accident Lawyer
Intersections bring drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, traffic signals, crosswalks, turning vehicles, and competing rights of way together in a small space. When one person enters that space unsafely, the result can be a serious collision.
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. represents people injured in intersection accidents throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island. Our New York City intersection accident lawyers investigate who had the right of way, what each road user did before the crash, and what evidence can establish how the collision actually happened.
- Motor Vehicle Accident Case Results
When someone comes to us after a serious car accident, our focus is on helping them recover the compensation they need to move forward.
$7,000,000
verdict for a client who sustained an injury to her neck requiring surgery due to an automobile accident.
$4,950,000
for a woman struck by a bus resulting in brain injury and disability.
$4,650,000
at trial for a client who was a back seat passenger in South Carolina when a bus driver fell asleep and pushed the plaintiff’s vehicle off of the road.
Why Are New York City Intersections So Dangerous?
New York City intersections create multiple points where vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users can cross one another’s paths. Drivers may be turning left or right while pedestrians enter crosswalks, cyclists continue through the intersection, and other vehicles proceed from different directions. Speed, limited visibility, distraction, failure to yield, and traffic-control violations can turn one mistake into a serious crash.
An intersection is not simply where two streets meet. It is a place where several legal and physical movements have to work together at the same time.
A driver proceeding straight may encounter a vehicle turning left across the lane. A driver making a right turn may cross a pedestrian’s path. Parked vehicles near a corner can affect sight lines. A cyclist may be traveling beside traffic that is about to turn. At larger intersections, several lanes of traffic may be moving or waiting simultaneously.
New York City itself treats intersections as a major traffic-safety concern. NYC DOT has reported that roughly half of all traffic fatalities occur at intersections and has introduced intersection treatments designed to improve visibility and reduce conflicts among drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
That complexity also explains why intersection crashes frequently produce disputes about fault. The physical point of impact may tell only part of the story. Determining what happened can require reconstructing the movements of everyone involved during the seconds before the collision.
Who Has the Right of Way at a New York Intersection?
Who has the right of way at a New York intersection depends on the traffic signals, signs, vehicle movements, pedestrians or cyclists present, and how the vehicles entered the intersection. New York law contains specific rules for vehicles entering intersections, making left turns, approaching stop or yield signs, and interacting with pedestrians and other traffic. Having a green light also does not eliminate every duty to proceed safely.
New York Vehicle and Traffic Law contains several different right-of-way rules because there is no single rule governing every intersection.
At an intersection without traffic controls, VTL § 1140 generally requires a driver approaching an intersection to yield to a vehicle that has already entered from another highway. When two vehicles enter from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver on the left generally must yield to the driver on the right.
Different rules apply when signs, signals, or turning movements are involved.
A driver making a left turn must yield to an oncoming vehicle that is already within the intersection or is close enough to constitute an immediate hazard under VTL § 1141.
A driver approaching a stop sign must stop and then yield to vehicles that are already in the intersection or approaching closely enough to create an immediate hazard under VTL § 1142.
Traffic signals add another layer. VTL § 1111 governs traffic-control signal indications and requires drivers to respect the rights of traffic and pedestrians lawfully within the intersection or adjacent crosswalk.
This is why “I had the right of way” can be the beginning of the analysis rather than the end of it.
The question is what right of way existed under the particular circumstances—and whether everyone involved acted with reasonable care as the situation developed.
Who Is Usually at Fault in an Intersection Accident?
Fault in an intersection accident often depends on whether a driver violated a traffic signal, stop sign, right-of-way rule, or another duty of reasonable care. A driver may be responsible for running a red light, failing to stop, turning left across approaching traffic, failing to yield, speeding, or entering an intersection when it was unsafe to do so. Some crashes involve fault by more than one person.
Intersection crashes often look straightforward after impact.
One vehicle has damage to the front. Another has damage to the side. One driver insists the light was green. The other says exactly the same thing.
None of those facts, standing alone, necessarily resolves liability.
An investigation may need to determine:
- which direction each vehicle was traveling;
- what traffic controls applied;
- the signal phase when each vehicle entered;
- whether either driver was turning;
- vehicle speeds and braking;
- whether sight lines were obstructed;
- whether pedestrians or cyclists were present;
- what independent witnesses observed;
- whether video captured the collision; and
- whether either driver violated a New York traffic law.
In some cases, one driver’s conduct is overwhelmingly responsible. In others, several actions contribute to the crash.
The goal is not to begin with the damage and invent a story around it. It is to reconstruct the sequence of events that produced the damage.
What If Both Drivers Say They Had the Green Light?
When both drivers claim they had a green light, fault may be established through evidence independent of either driver’s account. Surveillance video, dashcam footage, eyewitnesses, traffic-signal information, police evidence, vehicle data, photographs, and the physical circumstances of the collision may help determine which vehicle entered the intersection lawfully and how the crash occurred.
This is one of the classic intersection-accident disputes.
Two drivers enter an intersection from conflicting directions. A collision occurs. Each says the other ran the light.
When that happens, the case does not have to become an unsolvable contest between two stories.
New York City creates potential sources of evidence that may not exist on a rural road. Nearby apartment buildings, storefronts, banks, parking facilities, buses, taxis, rideshare vehicles, delivery vehicles, and private vehicles may have cameras capable of capturing some portion of the intersection.
Witnesses may have been standing on a corner or waiting to cross.
The timing and operation of the traffic signal may also become relevant. Physical evidence can show vehicle movement, impact orientation, braking, or evasive action.
Even video that does not show the traffic signal itself can sometimes be useful. Footage may show when traffic in another direction begins moving, when pedestrians receive a crossing phase, how vehicles reacted, or where each vehicle was immediately before impact.
A driver’s statement matters.
It just does not have to be the only evidence.
How Do You Prove Who Had the Right of Way?
Proving right of way after an intersection crash can require evidence showing the traffic controls, signal phase, direction and movement of each vehicle, and where the vehicles were immediately before impact. Useful evidence may include video footage, witness statements, police records, photographs, vehicle data, traffic-signal information, road markings, and accident reconstruction in appropriate cases.
Right of way is a legal conclusion built from facts.
First, the intersection itself matters. Was it controlled by a traffic light, stop sign, yield sign, or no traffic-control device? Were there dedicated turn arrows? Marked crosswalks? Bicycle lanes? Restricted turns?
Next comes movement.
Was one driver proceeding straight while another turned left? Had one vehicle already entered the intersection? Did a driver stop before proceeding? Was a pedestrian legally within the crosswalk? Did one vehicle accelerate into the intersection while another was already committed to crossing?
Then the evidence has to establish those facts as reliably as possible.
Photographs taken after the crash may preserve lane markings, signs, sight obstructions, vehicle positions, debris, and skid or tire marks. Video may establish timing and movement. Witnesses may confirm the signal phase or which vehicle entered first. Vehicle information may help reconstruct speed or braking in some cases.
The stronger the evidence of what happened before impact, the less the case has to depend on competing recollections afterward.
Does Having a Green Light Automatically Mean a Driver Cannot Be at Fault?
No. A green light generally authorizes a driver to proceed, but it does not create an unlimited right to enter an intersection without regard for traffic or pedestrians already lawfully present. New York’s traffic-signal law requires drivers facing a green indication to yield to traffic lawfully within the intersection or an adjacent crosswalk, and drivers still have a duty to operate with reasonable care.
This is an important distinction because “the light was green” is sometimes treated as though it ends every inquiry.
It does not.
Under VTL § 1111, traffic facing a steady green signal may generally proceed straight or make a permitted turn, but turning traffic must respect other traffic and pedestrians lawfully within the intersection or adjacent crosswalk.
There are also situations in which danger becomes apparent after a driver receives the green light.
A pedestrian may still be lawfully completing a crossing. Traffic ahead may prevent a vehicle from safely clearing the intersection. Another vehicle may already be present. A driver may be turning across a cyclist’s path.
The existence of a favorable signal is highly relevant to right of way.
It is not permission to stop observing what is directly ahead.
What Evidence Can Prove Fault in a New York City Intersection Crash?
Evidence in a New York City intersection accident can include surveillance and traffic-camera footage, dashcams, eyewitness accounts, police records, photographs, vehicle damage, electronic vehicle data, traffic-signal records, road design information, and physical evidence from the scene. The most useful evidence depends on what is disputed and should be identified and preserved as early as possible.
Intersection cases often reward early investigation because several independent sources may help answer the same question.
A storefront camera may show the vehicles approaching.
A dashcam may show the signal.
A witness may have seen one vehicle enter against the light.
Photographs may establish lane positions and sight lines.
Vehicle data may provide information about speed, braking, or other actions in appropriate cases.
The collision pattern itself can also matter. Damage locations, final vehicle positions, debris, roadway markings, and the geometry of the intersection can help an accident reconstruction professional evaluate how the vehicles moved.
No single item has to tell the entire story.
Often, the strongest reconstruction comes from several pieces of evidence that independently point toward the same sequence of events.
Why Injured New Yorkers Trust Us
1.
Decades of NYC Personal Injury Experience
For more than 70 years, our firm has represented injured New Yorkers in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. We understand how insurance companies evaluate claims and how to build cases that withstand scrutiny.
2.
Handling Complex NYC Car Accident Cases
Our attorneys represent victims injured in car accidents, truck collisions, rideshare crashes, pedestrian accidents, bicycle accidents, hit-and-run collisions, and other serious traffic-related incidents throughout New York City.
3.
Downtown Manhattan Office Serving All Five Boroughs
Located in Lower Manhattan, our office is easily accessible from throughout New York City. We represent clients across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island and can move quickly to preserve evidence after a serious crash.
4.
Proven Results In Serious Injury Cases
Our attorneys have secured significant verdicts and settlements in cases involving automobile accidents, pedestrian injuries, truck collisions, bus crashes, and other catastrophic injury matters throughout New York.
5.
No Fee Unless We Recover Compensation
We handle car accident cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no legal fees unless we recover compensation on your behalf.
Meet Our New York City Car Accident Attorneys
For decades, the attorneys at Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput have represented individuals and families throughout New York City in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. Our legal team combines extensive courtroom experience, strategic case preparation, and a commitment to personalized client service to help accident victims pursue the compensation they deserve.
Michael Jaffe
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Representing injured car accident victims throughout New York City.
Matthew J. Fein
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Helping clients pursue compensation after serious motor vehicle accidents.
Eugene Gozenput
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Advocating for injury victims throughout Manhattan and the five boroughs.
What Are the Most Common Types of Intersection Accidents in New York City?
Common New York City intersection crashes include T-bone collisions, left-turn accidents, red-light crashes, stop-sign accidents, failure-to-yield collisions, and crashes involving pedestrians or cyclists. These categories frequently overlap because one unsafe action—such as an improper left turn or failure to obey a signal—can determine both the type of collision and the question of fault.
Intersection accidents are better understood by looking at how the paths of the people or vehicles came into conflict.
T-Bone Collisions
A T-bone or side-impact collision occurs when the front of one vehicle strikes the side of another.
These crashes frequently happen when one vehicle enters an intersection while another is crossing through it. Red-light violations, stop-sign violations, failure to yield, and unsafe turns can all produce T-bone impacts.
Side-impact crashes can be particularly serious because the side of a passenger vehicle generally provides less distance between the point of impact and an occupant than the front or rear of the vehicle.
Left-Turn Accidents
Left turns create one of the most obvious crossing conflicts at an intersection.
Under VTL § 1141, a driver intending to turn left must yield to oncoming traffic that is within the intersection or close enough to constitute an immediate hazard.
A driver who misjudges the speed or distance of an approaching vehicle, turns without seeing it, or tries to beat traffic through the intersection can cause a severe collision.
Red-Light Accidents
A driver who enters an intersection against a red signal may collide with traffic moving through the cross street, a pedestrian in a crosswalk, or a cyclist traveling with the lawful signal.
These cases can become heavily disputed when drivers give conflicting accounts of the signal phase, making independent evidence especially important.
Stop-Sign Accidents
Stopping at the sign is only part of the obligation.
After stopping, VTL § 1142 requires the driver to yield to traffic already within the intersection or approaching closely enough to constitute an immediate hazard.
A driver can therefore come to a complete stop and still cause a crash by proceeding before it is safe.
Failure-to-Yield Accidents
Failure to yield can occur during left turns, at stop or yield signs, when entering a roadway, or in interactions with pedestrians and other lawful road users.
These cases require identifying exactly which right-of-way rule applied to the movement that caused the collision.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Intersection Accidents
Intersections place pedestrians and cyclists directly alongside turning and through traffic.
New York law requires drivers to exercise due care to avoid collisions with pedestrians and bicyclists. Crosswalk and traffic-signal rules can create additional obligations depending on the intersection and signal phase.
Visibility becomes especially important when a driver is turning across a crosswalk or bicycle path.
Why Are Turning Vehicles Such a Serious Risk to Pedestrians and Cyclists?
Turning vehicles create a dangerous intersection conflict because a driver must monitor several things at once while the vehicle’s path may cross a pedestrian crosswalk or a cyclist’s line of travel. New York law requires drivers to exercise due care to avoid colliding with pedestrians and bicyclists, and additional right-of-way rules may apply based on the signal, crosswalk, and movement involved.
A driver turning at a New York City intersection may be watching approaching vehicles while simultaneously checking the crosswalk, cyclists, traffic signals, lane markings, and the intended destination lane.
That divided visual task can become dangerous when the driver focuses primarily on finding a gap in vehicle traffic.
The pedestrian or cyclist may be exactly where the driver failed to look.
New York’s VTL § 1146 imposes a duty on drivers to exercise due care to avoid colliding with bicyclists and pedestrians. Other provisions address pedestrian rights of way in crosswalks and the obligations of turning traffic.
NYC DOT’s continuing work on intersection visibility reinforces the practical importance of sight lines. The agency has specifically used treatments such as hardened daylighting to reduce visual obstructions near corners and improve visibility among turning drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists.
When a serious intersection crash occurs, the investigation should therefore examine more than the signal color. Visibility, vehicle movement, crosswalk activity, speed, and where the driver was looking can all matter.
Can Surveillance or Traffic-Camera Footage Prove an Intersection Accident?
Video can be powerful evidence in an intersection accident because it may show vehicle movements, signal timing, pedestrians, cyclists, braking, speed relative to surrounding traffic, or which vehicle entered first. Useful footage may come from businesses, residential buildings, dashcams, buses, taxis, delivery vehicles, or other nearby cameras. Availability varies, and recordings may not be retained indefinitely.
New York City is full of cameras.
That does not mean every intersection crash was recorded—or that every recording will still exist when someone finally asks for it.
This distinction matters.
A privately owned camera may retain footage for only a limited period before automatically overwriting it. A business may replace or erase recordings in the ordinary course of its operations. A vehicle equipped with a dashcam may leave the area immediately after the crash.
That makes the first days after a serious intersection collision potentially important.
An investigation can include identifying buildings and businesses with a view of the roadway, speaking with witnesses who may have recorded the aftermath, determining whether involved or nearby vehicles contained cameras, and evaluating whether government-controlled records may exist.
The useful camera does not necessarily have to be pointed directly at the point of impact.
A camera showing a vehicle’s approach, the movement of surrounding traffic, or the signal sequence immediately before the crash may still help establish what happened.
What If Poor Visibility Contributed to the Intersection Crash?
Poor visibility can contribute to an intersection crash when parked vehicles, construction, vegetation, signs, roadway geometry, lighting, weather, or other conditions prevent road users from seeing one another in time. The existence of an obstruction does not automatically determine liability, but visibility should be documented and evaluated when it may have contributed to the collision.
Sight distance can change an intersection dramatically.
A driver may have a clear view from one approach and a heavily obstructed view from another. A parked truck can hide a pedestrian. Construction barriers can affect the view of cross traffic. Darkness or glare can make a cyclist more difficult to detect.
NYC DOT describes intersections as natural conflict points and has studied “daylighting”—removing parking or other visual obstacles adjacent to crosswalks—as a way of improving lines of sight.
When visibility is relevant to a crash, photographs should capture what each road user could actually see from the relevant position, not merely what the intersection looks like while standing on the sidewalk afterward.
Timing matters here too.
A delivery truck moves.
Construction barriers disappear.
Vehicles parked near a corner leave.
The scene someone photographs three weeks later may not be the scene that existed when the collision happened.
What If a Traffic Signal or Intersection Design Contributed to the Accident?
A malfunctioning signal, obscured sign, unusual roadway configuration, poor visibility, or another intersection condition can sometimes become relevant to an accident investigation. Claims involving street design, traffic controls, or government entities are legally different from an ordinary claim against another driver and can involve specialized proof, defenses, notice requirements, and shorter deadlines.
Most intersection accidents are primarily about the conduct of the people using the roadway.
But not all of them are.
A traffic signal may malfunction. A sign may be obscured or damaged. Road construction may alter normal traffic movements. Lane markings may create confusion. A visibility problem may contribute to a conflict.
Those possibilities should be investigated when the facts support them rather than assumed simply because a collision occurred at a difficult intersection.
Claims involving New York City or another governmental entity also present legal issues that do not arise in a routine two-driver collision. Special procedural requirements and significantly shorter notice periods may apply.
The first task is therefore factual:
Was there actually something about the traffic control or intersection condition that contributed to the crash?
Only then does the question become who may bear legal responsibility for it.
Why Should Evidence Be Preserved Quickly After an Intersection Accident?
Intersection evidence can disappear quickly. Surveillance footage may be overwritten, witnesses can become difficult to locate, vehicles are repaired, debris is removed, construction conditions change, and temporary sight obstructions disappear. Preserving evidence early can be especially important when drivers dispute the traffic signal, right of way, vehicle movement, or visibility at the time of the crash.
An intersection can look completely ordinary a few days after a serious collision.
That does not mean the evidence is still there.
The vehicles may have been towed. Broken components and debris may have been swept away. A construction crew may have moved barriers. Parked vehicles that affected visibility may be gone. Nearby businesses may already be recording over video from the day of the crash.
Witness memory also changes.
Someone who clearly remembers seeing a vehicle enter against the light immediately after the collision may remember fewer details months later.
That is why preservation is not merely about preparing for litigation.
It is about preserving the best available version of what actually happened before the physical and electronic record begins changing.
What Should You Do After Being Injured in a New York City Intersection Accident?
After an intersection accident, prioritize medical care and safety, report the crash when required, and preserve whatever evidence you reasonably can. Photographs of vehicles, signals, signs, lane markings, sight obstructions, and the surrounding intersection may become important. Witness information and potential video sources can also matter, particularly when fault or the traffic signal is disputed.
Serious injuries can make gathering evidence at the scene impossible.
Medical care comes first.
If circumstances allow, however, intersection-specific details can become unusually important later.
Photographs should capture more than vehicle damage. Images showing the approaches to the intersection, traffic lights, signs, crosswalks, lane arrows, bicycle lanes, nearby cameras, construction, parked vehicles, and sight lines can help preserve context.
Names and contact information for independent witnesses can be valuable.
If someone mentions that a nearby store has a camera or that their dashcam recorded the crash, write that down.
And be cautious about making confident statements regarding fault while still shaken or injured. Intersection collisions can unfold in seconds, and people do not always know what another vehicle, pedestrian, or signal was doing outside their field of view.
The investigation can sort that out.
Frequently Asked Questions About Intersection Accidents in New York City
Intersection crashes often produce immediate disputes about traffic lights, right of way, turning vehicles, video footage, pedestrians, and who entered first. The answers below address some of the questions that commonly arise after a serious New York City intersection collision.
Who is at fault in a T-bone accident at an intersection?
Short answer: Fault depends on which vehicle had the right of way and how each driver entered or moved through the intersection.
A T-bone impact does not automatically establish fault. One driver may have run a red light or stop sign, failed to yield while turning, or entered when another vehicle had the right of way. Video, witnesses, traffic controls, vehicle damage, road evidence, and other information may help establish the sequence of events.
If I had a green light, is the other driver automatically at fault?
Short answer: Not automatically, although having the lawful green signal can be powerful evidence of right of way.
New York law generally permits traffic facing a green indication to proceed, but drivers must still account for traffic and pedestrians lawfully within the intersection or adjacent crosswalk. The complete circumstances of the collision determine fault.
Who has the right of way when two cars reach an uncontrolled intersection at the same time?
Short answer: Under New York VTL § 1140, when two vehicles enter an intersection from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver on the left generally must yield to the driver on the right.
The rule can be affected by other traffic-control provisions and the actual timing of each vehicle’s entry, so determining whether the vehicles truly arrived at approximately the same time can matter.
Who is at fault when a driver makes a left turn in front of another car?
Short answer: A left-turning driver generally must yield to oncoming traffic that is already within the intersection or close enough to constitute an immediate hazard.
New York VTL § 1141 establishes that right-of-way rule. Fault still depends on the complete circumstances, including vehicle speed, distance, signals, visibility, and the conduct of both drivers.
Can a driver be at fault even if they stopped at the stop sign?
Short answer: Yes. Stopping does not by itself give a driver the right to proceed.
After stopping, New York VTL § 1142 requires the driver to yield to vehicles already within the intersection or approaching closely enough to constitute an immediate hazard. A driver who stops and then pulls into the path of approaching traffic may still be responsible for the resulting collision.
What happens if both drivers claim the light was green?
Short answer: The claim can be investigated using evidence other than the drivers’ competing statements.
Surveillance footage, dashcams, eyewitness testimony, traffic-signal information, police evidence, vehicle data, photographs, and physical evidence may help establish which vehicle entered lawfully. A case does not necessarily become impossible simply because the drivers disagree.
Can a lawyer get video of my intersection accident?
Short answer: Potentially, but whether useful footage exists depends on the location and how quickly potential sources are identified.
Businesses, apartment buildings, parking facilities, buses, taxis, delivery vehicles, dashcams, and other cameras may have captured the crash or events leading to it. Some systems overwrite recordings quickly, which is one reason early investigation can matter.
Do NYC traffic cameras record every intersection accident?
Short answer: No. You should not assume that a government traffic camera recorded or preserved your collision.
Camera coverage, purpose, recording capability, retention, and access vary. An investigation should consider government and private sources rather than relying on the assumption that footage automatically exists because a camera is visible near the intersection.
Can a pedestrian have the right of way when a driver has a green light?
Short answer: Yes. A green light does not necessarily give a turning driver priority over a pedestrian lawfully within an adjacent crosswalk.
New York traffic-signal and pedestrian right-of-way laws require drivers to account for pedestrians lawfully using crosswalks. The applicable pedestrian signal, traffic signal, vehicle movement, and timing all matter.
What if a parked truck or other vehicle blocked the driver's view?
Short answer: A sight obstruction can be important evidence, but it does not automatically excuse unsafe driving or determine liability.
The investigation should document what each person could see, where the obstruction was located, and whether the driver adjusted speed or behavior for the limited visibility. Temporary obstructions should be photographed quickly when possible because they may disappear.
What if the traffic light was not working properly?
Short answer: A malfunctioning traffic signal can materially change an intersection-accident investigation.
Evidence may be needed to establish whether the signal actually malfunctioned, how long the problem existed, whether it had been reported, and how it affected the collision. Potential claims involving a governmental entity can also involve special legal requirements and shorter deadlines.
Can more than one driver be responsible for an intersection accident?
Short answer: Yes. More than one person’s conduct can contribute to the same intersection crash.
For example, one driver may make an unsafe turn while another is speeding or otherwise operating unsafely. New York’s rules governing comparative fault can affect recovery when responsibility is shared, and current law includes specific provisions applicable to certain motor vehicle personal injury actions.
What compensation may be available after an intersection accident?
Short answer: Depending on the case, compensation may include medical expenses, lost income, future treatment costs, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and other losses caused by the injuries.
New York’s No-Fault insurance system, statutory serious-injury requirements, fault, insurance coverage, and the nature and permanence of the injuries can all affect what compensation may be pursued.
How long do I have to file an intersection accident lawsuit in New York?
Short answer: Many negligence-based motor vehicle injury lawsuits in New York are subject to a three-year limitations period, but different and substantially shorter deadlines can apply in some cases.
Claims involving New York City, another governmental entity, or unusual circumstances may involve additional notice and filing requirements. The correct deadline should be determined from the specific facts rather than assuming the general period applies to every claim.
When should I contact a New York City intersection accident lawyer?
Short answer: After a serious intersection crash, early legal guidance can be particularly useful when fault is disputed or evidence may disappear.
An attorney can investigate traffic controls and right of way, identify video and witnesses, preserve relevant evidence, evaluate insurance coverage, and determine applicable legal deadlines. Early investigation can be especially important when both drivers tell conflicting stories about what happened.
Talk To a New York City Intersection Accident Lawyer
Intersection crashes can become complicated quickly when drivers disagree about the light, the right of way, a turning movement, or who entered first. The answer may be found in evidence that will not remain available forever. If you were seriously injured in an intersection accident in New York City, Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. can investigate what happened, explain how New York law applies to your circumstances, and help you understand your options.
Talk To Us For FreeServing Accident Victims Throughout New York City From Our Lower Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput represents injury victims throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island from our office at 20 Vesey Street in Lower Manhattan. Conveniently located near multiple major subway lines and transportation hubs, our office is easily accessible to clients across New York City seeking experienced legal representation after a serious accident.
Our Downtown Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C.
20 Vesey Street, Suite 700
New York, NY 10007
917-983-2343
Our firm is located in downtown Manhattan, just steps from major subway lines serving every borough of New York City. Being based in Lower Manhattan allows us to stay closely connected to the courts, agencies, and neighborhoods where serious personal injury cases are handled, while remaining easy to reach for clients traveling from throughout the city.
Getting to Our Manhattan Office by Subway
Our Lower Manhattan office at 20 Vesey Street is conveniently located near several major subway stations serving Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx. Clients visiting our office can easily reach us using the A, C, E, 2, 3, 4, 5, J, and Z lines, with multiple stations located just a short walk away.
Fulton Street Station
A
C
E
2
3
4
5
J
Z
Approx. 2–4 minute walk
Park Place Station
2
3
Approx. 3-5 minute walk
Wall Street Station
2
3
Approx. 5-7 minute walk
Chambers Street Station
J
Z
Approx. 5-7 minute walk