New York City T-Bone Accident Lawyer
Being T-boned can leave you dealing with injuries, a badly damaged vehicle, insurance calls, and a frustrating question: how do you prove what happened when the other driver tells a completely different story?
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. represents people injured in T-bone and side-impact crashes throughout New York City. We investigate the moments before the impact, preserve evidence that can establish who had the right of way, and help injured New Yorkers understand what happens next when a serious collision suddenly becomes an insurance claim and a legal problem.
- Motor Vehicle Accident Case Results
When someone comes to us after a serious car accident, our focus is on helping them recover the compensation they need to move forward.
$7,000,000
verdict for a client who sustained an injury to her neck requiring surgery due to an automobile accident.
$4,950,000
for a woman struck by a bus resulting in brain injury and disability.
$4,650,000
at trial for a client who was a back seat passenger in South Carolina when a bus driver fell asleep and pushed the plaintiff’s vehicle off of the road.
You Were T-Boned in New York City. What Should You Do Now?
A T-bone accident is a side-impact collision in which the front of one vehicle strikes the side of another, creating a shape similar to the letter T. These crashes frequently occur at intersections when a driver runs a red light or stop sign, fails to yield, or turns across another vehicle’s path. Either vehicle can be the one that caused the crash.
The minutes after a side-impact crash can be chaotic.
Your first responsibility is not building a lawsuit. It is dealing with the immediate situation safely.
Call for emergency assistance when necessary and seek medical attention for injuries that need it. A T-bone impact can subject occupants to substantial forces, particularly when the collision occurs near the driver’s or passenger’s door.
If you are physically able to document the scene, widen your focus beyond the damaged vehicles.
Photograph the traffic light or stop sign controlling the intersection. Capture lane markings, turn lanes, crosswalks, sight obstructions, vehicle positions, debris, and the surrounding buildings.
Look for witnesses.
Look for cameras.
A pharmacy, apartment building, restaurant, parking garage, bus, taxi, delivery vehicle, or another driver’s dashcam may have recorded something important.
You do not need to solve fault while standing beside the wreck.
Preserve what you reasonably can so the evidence can help answer that question later.
When the Other Driver Says the Crash Was Your Fault
The other driver’s accusation does not determine legal fault. T-bone crashes often produce conflicting stories about traffic lights, right of way, speed, and turning movements. Video, independent witnesses, vehicle damage, scene evidence, traffic controls, electronic vehicle information, and New York traffic law may provide a more reliable account of what happened than either driver’s version alone.
This can be one of the most unsettling parts of an intersection crash.
You remember proceeding through the intersection.
The other driver gets out and immediately says:
“You pulled out in front of me.”
Or:
“My light was green.”
A few days later, their insurance company repeats the same accusation as though the matter has already been decided.
It has not.
An insurance company’s position is a claim decision. It is not a court finding, and it does not make contradictory evidence disappear.
The investigation starts by reconstructing the vehicles’ movements.
Who was traveling straight?
Was someone turning left?
What traffic control applied?
Which vehicle entered first?
Was either driver speeding?
Was visibility obstructed?
Where did the impact occur?
Could either driver reasonably have avoided it?
T-bone collisions are particularly deceptive because the vehicle with front-end damage is not necessarily the vehicle that caused the crash. A driver proceeding lawfully can strike the side of a car that suddenly enters the driver’s path.
The damage shows where the vehicles met.
The evidence has to explain why they met there.
How Can You Prove the Other Driver Ran the Light or Failed to Yield?
A red-light or failure-to-yield violation can be proven with evidence beyond the drivers’ statements. Surveillance footage, dashcams, eyewitnesses, traffic-signal information, photographs, vehicle data, physical evidence, and the timing and movement of surrounding traffic may help establish who entered the intersection lawfully and who created the conflict that caused the T-bone crash.
Suppose both drivers insist they had the green light.
That does not mean the case is destined to become one person’s word against another’s.
New York City can provide an unusually rich environment for independent evidence.
A storefront camera may show the intersection.
A dashcam may capture the signal.
Someone waiting to cross may have watched the entire collision.
Even video that does not show the traffic light can be useful. It may show when cross traffic began moving, the timing of pedestrian movement, where each vehicle was moments before impact, or how other drivers reacted.
New York’s traffic laws also provide the framework for interpreting those facts.
Under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111, traffic facing a steady red signal generally must stop and remain stopped until permitted to proceed. Under VTL § 1141, a driver turning left must yield to approaching traffic that is within the intersection or close enough to constitute an immediate hazard. VTL § 1142 makes clear that a driver at a stop sign must do more than stop—the driver must also yield before entering when other traffic presents an immediate hazard.
Those are different violations, but each can produce the same physical result:
One vehicle crossing directly into another’s path.
What If There Is No Video of the T-Bone Crash?
A T-bone accident can still be proven without video. Witness testimony, vehicle damage, final vehicle positions, photographs, debris, roadway evidence, police observations, traffic controls, electronic vehicle data, medical evidence, and accident reconstruction may help establish how the collision occurred. Video can be valuable, but it is only one potential form of evidence.
Finding a clear recording of the crash can feel like winning the evidentiary lottery.
Not finding one does not mean there is no case.
Consider what else the collision left behind.
The vehicles themselves contain information. The location and angle of damage can help establish how they came together. Final resting positions may provide additional context. Debris can identify the area of impact.
Witnesses may remember which vehicle entered first or what the traffic signal displayed.
Electronic information may be available from a vehicle in appropriate cases.
The intersection itself provides context through its lanes, signs, signal configuration, sight lines, and permitted movements.
Sometimes the useful question is not:
“Is there a video of the impact?”
It is:
“What evidence exists that makes one explanation of this crash more consistent with the facts than the other?”
That is a much broader investigation.
What If the Police Report Says You Caused the Accident?
A police report can be important evidence, but it does not necessarily make the final legal determination of fault. Officers may document statements, witnesses, vehicle positions, apparent violations, and observations at the scene. If the report contains incomplete or inaccurate information, other evidence such as video, photographs, witnesses, vehicle data, and physical evidence may tell a different story.
People understandably place enormous weight on the police report.
After all, it is the official document created after the crash.
But an officer usually arrives after the collision has already happened.
Unless the officer witnessed it, the report may depend partly on what the drivers and witnesses said afterward and what could be observed at the scene.
That information can be extremely useful.
It can also be incomplete.
A witness may leave before speaking with police. Surveillance footage may not yet have been found. One driver may be taken away for medical treatment before giving a complete account. The significance of vehicle data or physical evidence may not be apparent during the initial response.
A mistake or unfavorable conclusion in a report should be taken seriously.
It should not automatically be treated as the last word on what happened.
Should You Talk to the Other Driver's Insurance Company?
You should be cautious about giving a recorded statement or detailed account to the other driver’s insurance company before understanding your rights and the extent of your injuries. The insurer represents its policyholder and its own financial interests, not you. Basic claim information may need to be exchanged, but you are not required to help the other insurer build its liability defense against you.
The call may sound routine.
An adjuster wants to “get your side of the story.”
The questions may be friendly.
But the other driver’s insurer is investigating whether its insured is legally responsible and how much the company may have to pay.
In a disputed T-bone accident, details matter.
How far away was the other vehicle when you entered?
When did you first see it?
Did you look left and right?
Were you distracted?
Could you have stopped?
How fast were you traveling?
How badly are you hurt?
A person answering those questions days after a frightening collision may unintentionally estimate distances, speeds, timing, or medical outcomes they do not actually know.
There is an important difference between being truthful and feeling obligated to speculate.
You can be completely honest and still say:
“I don’t know.”
Who Pays Your Medical Bills After a T-Bone Accident in New York?
New York’s No-Fault insurance system generally provides first-party benefits for covered people injured in motor vehicle accidents regardless of who caused the crash. Basic economic loss can include qualifying medical and rehabilitation expenses, lost earnings, and certain other necessary expenses, subject to statutory limits and coverage rules. A separate liability claim may address losses available outside the No-Fault system.
This is one of the most confusing things about being injured in a New York car accident.
The other driver may have caused the crash, yet your initial medical expenses may be handled through No-Fault coverage rather than waiting for the liability dispute to be resolved.
That is intentional.
New York Insurance Law § 5103 establishes first-party benefits for qualifying losses arising from covered motor vehicle injuries without first requiring the injured person to prove who caused the collision.
Under New York Insurance Law § 5102, “basic economic loss” includes up to $50,000 per person in combined qualifying losses, including necessary medical and hospital expenses, certain rehabilitation expenses, lost earnings subject to statutory rules, and specified other reasonable and necessary expenses.
That does not mean No-Fault compensates every loss caused by a serious T-bone crash.
Pain and suffering is different.
Future losses can be different.
Economic losses beyond the No-Fault framework can raise different issues.
Understanding which insurance pays which loss is part of understanding the claim.
If No-Fault Pays Your Bills, Can You Still Sue the Driver Who T-Boned You?
Potentially, yes. No-Fault benefits and a liability claim serve different purposes. Under New York Insurance Law § 5104, a covered person generally must sustain a statutory “serious injury” to recover non-economic damages such as pain and suffering from another covered person. The current definition includes categories such as fractures, significant disfigurement, and specified permanent or significant limitations.
No-Fault does not mean:
“Nobody was at fault.”
And it does not mean:
“You cannot bring a claim against the driver who caused the crash.”
It means New York uses a first-party insurance system for certain economic losses while separately regulating when an injured person can pursue non-economic damages from another covered person.
This is where the phrase “serious injury” matters.
It has a specific statutory meaning.
Under the current version of New York Insurance Law § 5102(d), serious injury includes death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, a fracture, loss of a fetus, permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system, permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member, or significant limitation of use of a body function or system.
That is the current 2026 statutory definition.
Whether a particular injury satisfies one of those categories depends on the medical evidence and circumstances—not simply on whether the injury feels serious to the person experiencing it.
This is also why two T-bone crashes that look nearly identical in photographs can produce very different legal claims.
The collision configuration may be the same.
The injuries may not be.
Why Injured New Yorkers Trust Us
1.
Decades of NYC Personal Injury Experience
For more than 70 years, our firm has represented injured New Yorkers in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. We understand how insurance companies evaluate claims and how to build cases that withstand scrutiny.
2.
Handling Complex NYC Car Accident Cases
Our attorneys represent victims injured in car accidents, truck collisions, rideshare crashes, pedestrian accidents, bicycle accidents, hit-and-run collisions, and other serious traffic-related incidents throughout New York City.
3.
Downtown Manhattan Office Serving All Five Boroughs
Located in Lower Manhattan, our office is easily accessible from throughout New York City. We represent clients across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island and can move quickly to preserve evidence after a serious crash.
4.
Proven Results In Serious Injury Cases
Our attorneys have secured significant verdicts and settlements in cases involving automobile accidents, pedestrian injuries, truck collisions, bus crashes, and other catastrophic injury matters throughout New York.
5.
No Fee Unless We Recover Compensation
We handle car accident cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no legal fees unless we recover compensation on your behalf.
Meet Our New York City Car Accident Attorneys
For decades, the attorneys at Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput have represented individuals and families throughout New York City in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. Our legal team combines extensive courtroom experience, strategic case preparation, and a commitment to personalized client service to help accident victims pursue the compensation they deserve.
Michael Jaffe
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Representing injured car accident victims throughout New York City.
Matthew J. Fein
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Helping clients pursue compensation after serious motor vehicle accidents.
Eugene Gozenput
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Advocating for injury victims throughout Manhattan and the five boroughs.
Why T-Bone Crashes Can Hurt People So Badly
T-bone crashes can cause serious injuries because a side impact occurs relatively close to the occupants of the struck vehicle. Injury severity depends on the speed and angle of impact, which part of the vehicle was struck, occupant position, vehicle structure, restraint and airbag performance, intrusion into the passenger compartment, and whether the vehicle experiences additional impacts.
The name “T-bone” describes geometry.
It does not describe severity.
A side impact into the rear quarter of a large vehicle at relatively low speed can be very different from a direct strike into the driver’s door.
In the latter situation, there is comparatively little distance between the striking vehicle and the person sitting beside that door.
Modern vehicles use reinforced structures and side airbags to manage those forces, but occupants can still experience substantial trauma.
T-bone collisions may cause head and brain injuries, neck and spinal injuries, shoulder injuries, fractures, pelvic injuries, chest trauma, internal injuries, and other harm.
The struck vehicle may also rotate, hit another vehicle or fixed object, mount a sidewalk, or overturn, creating additional forces beyond the initial impact.
That is why the seriousness of a T-bone crash cannot be judged solely by whether the vehicles were traveling at “city speeds.”
When Pain and Symptoms Appear After You Leave the Scene
Some symptoms after a T-bone crash may become noticeable or worsen after the initial collision. Adrenaline, stress, and the nature of certain injuries can make the full extent of pain or impairment difficult to appreciate immediately. New or worsening symptoms should be taken seriously, and medical concerns should be evaluated by an appropriate healthcare professional rather than ignored because you initially felt “okay.”
There is a dangerous temptation after a crash to make a declaration about your body too early.
“I think I’m fine.”
Maybe you are.
Maybe an hour later your neck stiffens.
Maybe a headache develops that evening.
Maybe getting out of bed the next morning tells a very different story.
This does not mean every ache after an accident represents a serious injury.
It means the side of the road is a poor place to make a final medical diagnosis.
Pay attention to what your body is telling you, and seek appropriate medical care when symptoms warrant it.
From a legal perspective, accurate medical documentation also helps establish what injuries were identified, when symptoms were reported, what treatment was recommended, and how recovery progressed.
Your health is the first reason to get appropriate care.
The medical record becomes important because of it.
If the Crash Keeps You From Working
A person who misses work because of injuries from a T-bone accident may have access to qualifying lost-earnings benefits through New York’s No-Fault system, subject to statutory limits and offsets. A serious injury claim may also involve economic losses beyond those benefits, including diminished future earning capacity when lasting injuries reduce the person’s ability to work.
Missing three days of work is one problem.
Discovering that you may never again be able to perform the job you had before the crash is something entirely different.
New York’s No-Fault system includes qualifying lost earnings within basic economic loss, subject to the rules and limitations in the statute.
But serious injuries can create longer-term consequences.
A construction worker with permanent spinal restrictions may not be able to return to heavy physical labor.
A professional whose traumatic brain injury affects concentration or executive function may be physically capable of sitting at a desk while no longer being capable of performing the same work.
Someone may return part-time but earn substantially less.
Those losses require looking beyond the paychecks already missed.
The question becomes what the injured person likely would have earned without the collision compared with what the injury now allows them to earn.
That can become one of the most consequential parts of a serious injury claim.
What Compensation May Be Available After a Serious T-Bone Crash?
Compensation after a serious T-bone accident depends on the injuries, financial losses, fault, insurance coverage, and New York’s No-Fault and serious-injury rules. Depending on the claim, recoverable losses may include medical expenses outside applicable first-party benefits, lost income, diminished earning capacity, future care, pain and suffering, and other legally compensable damages.
There is no meaningful “average T-bone settlement.”
A T-bone collision is a type of crash, not a measure of damages.
One person may be treated and released with injuries that heal.
Another may undergo surgery and miss months of work.
Another may sustain a spinal cord or brain injury that changes the rest of their life.
The value of those claims cannot rationally be the same simply because the vehicles collided at a right angle.
A serious claim requires understanding both the past and the future:
What medical care has already been required?
Will additional treatment or surgery be necessary?
How much income has been lost?
Can the person return to the same work?
Are the injuries permanent?
How has everyday life changed?
What insurance coverage and responsible parties are available?
Those questions produce a damages analysis.
An online calculator does not.
What If Your Car Is Totaled?
A vehicle can be declared a total loss when the insurer determines that repairing it is not economically reasonable under the applicable valuation process. The property-damage claim is separate from the bodily-injury claim. Disputes can arise over vehicle value, repairability, storage, towing, rental transportation, and other property-related issues after a severe side-impact crash.
T-bone impacts can cause extensive structural damage.
The car may be sitting in a tow yard while you are simultaneously trying to deal with medical appointments and an injury claim.
It helps to recognize that these are related consequences of the same accident but separate insurance issues.
Resolving the vehicle claim does not necessarily resolve the personal injury claim.
Before signing broad releases or assuming that payment for the vehicle closes everything connected with the accident, understand exactly what is being settled.
And remove personal belongings from a vehicle that may be transferred, salvaged, or disposed of.
The car can be replaced.
Evidence and personal property become considerably harder to retrieve once it is gone.
What If the Driver Who Hit You Does Not Have Enough Insurance?
When the at-fault driver’s liability insurance is insufficient to cover a serious injury, other insurance may become important. Depending on the circumstances and available policies, supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, coverage involving other responsible parties, commercial policies, or other sources may need to be investigated before the full recovery picture is known.
A devastating injury does not guarantee that the driver who caused it carries enough liability insurance to pay for the damage.
That can become a major issue in serious T-bone cases.
The investigation should not necessarily stop at:
“Who was driving the other car?”
Who owned it?
Was the driver working?
Was the vehicle being used commercially?
Did an employer or business relationship exist?
Are there other responsible parties?
What coverage exists under the applicable policies?
Does the injured person’s own insurance provide additional protection?
Those questions become particularly important when medical needs, lost earnings, or permanent injuries substantially exceed the obvious liability coverage.
Identifying the responsible driver is one task.
Understanding the available sources of recovery is another.
What If You Were Partly Responsible for the T-Bone Crash?
Shared fault can significantly affect a New York motor vehicle injury claim. Under the current 2026 version of CPLR § 1411, a claimant in a personal injury action subject to Article 51 of the Insurance Law is barred from recovery if the claimant’s culpable conduct is greater than that of the person—or combined persons—from whom recovery is sought. Otherwise, fault can affect the amount recovered.
This is an area where older New York legal content can now be dangerously misleading.
For years, New York was routinely described as allowing an injured claimant to recover even when that person bore most of the fault, with damages simply reduced proportionately.
The law governing covered motor vehicle personal injury actions changed in 2026.
Current New York CPLR § 1411 creates a specific rule for personal injury actions subject to Article 51 of the Insurance Law. If the claimant’s culpable conduct is greater than the culpable conduct of the person—or combined persons—from whom recovery is sought, recovery is barred.
That makes accurate fault investigation even more consequential in a disputed T-bone case.
Suppose one driver made a questionable left turn while the approaching driver was speeding.
Or one driver entered from a stop sign while the other was distracted.
The answer should not be manufactured by deciding in advance that one person must bear 100 percent of the blame.
The evidence should establish what each person actually did.
Why Evidence From the Intersection Can Disappear So Quickly
Important T-bone accident evidence can disappear within days. Surveillance systems may overwrite footage, witnesses become harder to find, damaged vehicles are repaired or salvaged, and temporary conditions such as parked trucks or construction barriers can change. Prompt investigation is especially valuable when fault depends on a disputed light, turn, right of way, speed, or sight obstruction.
New York City produces enormous amounts of potential evidence.
It also has no obligation to freeze itself in place after your crash.
The truck that blocked the corner drives away.
The construction crew moves its barriers.
A restaurant’s security system records over last week’s footage.
The damaged vehicles leave the tow yard.
The witness who gave you only a first name disappears back into a city of millions of people.
The statute of limitations may measure how long someone has to commence a lawsuit.
It does not measure how long the best evidence will continue to exist.
When the other driver disputes fault after a serious T-bone collision, finding and preserving that evidence can be one of the most valuable things done early in the case.
Red-Light T-Bone Crashes Are a Recognized New York City Safety Problem
Red-light running is closely associated with dangerous side-impact crashes at intersections. NYC DOT reported in January 2026 that intersections using red-light cameras had experienced a 65% reduction in T-bone crashes and a 73% reduction in red-light running. The city is expanding the program toward 600 intersections by the end of 2026.
Those numbers help explain why red-light T-bone collisions deserve more than a generic warning about “dangerous intersections.”
When a driver enters against a red signal, the danger comes from crossing directly into traffic that may already have been given permission to move. According to NYC DOT’s January 2026 report on its red-light camera program, camera locations experienced a 65 percent reduction in T-bone crashes and a 73 percent reduction in red-light running.
That is the geometry of many T-bone crashes.
NYC DOT’s experience also provides useful real-world evidence that changing red-light behavior changes the number of these collisions. The agency reported that camera locations saw T-bone crashes fall 65 percent.
For someone injured in one of these crashes, however, the immediate issue is not the effectiveness of the city’s enforcement program.
It is whether the evidence can establish that the other driver entered against the signal in this collision.
That brings us back to video, witnesses, signal timing, vehicle movement, and the other evidence surrounding the intersection.
Statistics tell us the problem exists.
Your case still has to establish what happened to you.
Frequently Asked Questions After a T-Bone Accident in New York City
The questions below address some of the practical issues that may remain after a serious side-impact crash, from vehicle damage and delayed injuries to insurance disputes and the legal process.
Is the driver who hit the side of my car automatically at fault?
Short answer: No.
The striking vehicle is not automatically responsible. A driver with front-end damage may have been proceeding lawfully when another vehicle entered the intersection against a signal, failed to yield, or turned across its path. Fault depends on the events leading to the impact.
Can I have a T-bone accident case if there were no witnesses?
Short answer: Yes.
Witnesses are only one form of evidence. Video, vehicle damage, photographs, traffic controls, debris, electronic vehicle information, police observations, roadway evidence, and accident reconstruction may help establish what happened even when no independent eyewitness comes forward.
What if I didn't go to the hospital immediately after the crash?
Short answer: Not going to the hospital immediately does not automatically eliminate an injury claim.
People respond differently after collisions, and some symptoms become more apparent later. What matters medically is getting appropriate care when symptoms warrant it. From an evidentiary standpoint, insurers may scrutinize gaps between the crash and treatment, so accurate documentation of when symptoms began and how they progressed can become important.
Can I still have a claim if my car wasn't badly damaged?
Short answer: Vehicle damage and physical injury are related evidence, but one does not automatically determine the other.
Crash forces, impact location, occupant position, vehicle design, medical findings, and individual circumstances all matter. An injury claim should be evaluated from the medical and accident evidence rather than solely from photographs of the bumper or door.
What if the other driver got a traffic ticket?
Short answer: A citation can be relevant evidence, but it does not automatically determine the entire civil injury claim.
The underlying conduct, available evidence, applicable traffic law, and circumstances of the collision still matter. A civil claim and a traffic violation are related but distinct legal matters.
What if the other driver was speeding when I turned left?
Short answer: Both drivers’ conduct may need to be evaluated.
A left-turning driver generally must yield when approaching traffic presents an immediate hazard, but excessive speed by the approaching driver can affect timing, distance, avoidance, and fault. Evidence about the vehicles’ movements may be critical.
Does No-Fault mean nobody is responsible for the accident?
Short answer: No.
“No-Fault” describes New York’s system for paying certain first-party economic benefits without first resolving liability. Fault remains highly important when determining responsibility for a liability claim and damages available outside the first-party system.
Can I recover for pain and suffering after a T-bone crash?
Short answer: A covered person generally must satisfy New York’s statutory serious-injury requirement to recover non-economic damages such as pain and suffering from another covered person.
The current statutory categories are defined in Insurance Law § 5102(d). Whether an injury qualifies depends on the medical evidence and the applicable legal standard.
How much is my T-bone accident case worth?
Short answer: There is no reliable average value for a T-bone accident claim.
Case value depends on the injuries, medical treatment, prognosis, lost income, future losses, pain and suffering, fault, available insurance, and strength of the evidence. A collision type alone cannot determine value.
How long does a T-bone accident claim take?
Short answer: There is no fixed timetable.
The length of a claim can depend on the severity of the injuries, how long it takes to understand the medical prognosis, whether fault is disputed, insurance coverage, the parties involved, negotiations, and whether litigation becomes necessary.
Will my T-bone accident case have to go to court?
Short answer: Not necessarily.
Many claims resolve without a trial, but litigation may become necessary when the parties dispute fault, injuries, damages, insurance issues, or the amount of fair compensation. A case should be developed from the evidence whether it ultimately settles or proceeds toward trial.
What if I was a passenger in the car that was T-boned?
Short answer: An injured passenger may have a claim even though the passenger was not responsible for operating either vehicle.
Determining available benefits and potential claims can require identifying the vehicles, drivers, owners, insurance policies, and which person’s conduct caused or contributed to the collision.
What if an Uber, Lyft, taxi, truck, or commercial vehicle T-boned me?
Short answer: Commercial and rideshare crashes can involve insurance and responsibility beyond the individual driver.
The driver’s employment or operating status, vehicle ownership, applicable commercial or rideshare coverage, and the involvement of a business may need to be investigated. Those cases should not automatically be treated as ordinary two-car insurance claims.
What if my injuries turn out to be permanent?
Short answer: Permanent injuries can change the scope and value of a claim because future consequences become part of the analysis.
Future medical treatment, rehabilitation, reduced earning capacity, assistance, permanent limitations, pain and suffering, and other long-term losses may need to be documented rather than valuing the claim solely from expenses already incurred.
How soon should I contact a lawyer after a serious T-bone crash?
Short answer: Early legal help can be especially useful when injuries are significant, fault is disputed, or evidence may disappear.
An attorney can begin identifying video and witnesses, examining right of way and traffic controls, preserving relevant evidence, reviewing insurance coverage, and protecting the claim while the injured person focuses on medical care.
You Don’t Have to Figure Out What Happened—or What Comes Next—By Yourself
A serious T-bone crash can leave you trying to recover physically while insurance companies argue about a traffic light, a turn, or who entered the intersection first. Meanwhile, medical bills arrive, work gets missed, your vehicle may be gone, and evidence of what actually happened can begin disappearing. Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. can investigate the crash, explain how New York’s insurance and injury laws apply to your situation, and help you understand what comes next.
Talk To Us For FreeServing Accident Victims Throughout New York City From Our Lower Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput represents injury victims throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island from our office at 20 Vesey Street in Lower Manhattan. Conveniently located near multiple major subway lines and transportation hubs, our office is easily accessible to clients across New York City seeking experienced legal representation after a serious accident.
Our Downtown Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C.
20 Vesey Street, Suite 700
New York, NY 10007
917-983-2343
Our firm is located in downtown Manhattan, just steps from major subway lines serving every borough of New York City. Being based in Lower Manhattan allows us to stay closely connected to the courts, agencies, and neighborhoods where serious personal injury cases are handled, while remaining easy to reach for clients traveling from throughout the city.
Getting to Our Manhattan Office by Subway
Our Lower Manhattan office at 20 Vesey Street is conveniently located near several major subway stations serving Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx. Clients visiting our office can easily reach us using the A, C, E, 2, 3, 4, 5, J, and Z lines, with multiple stations located just a short walk away.
Fulton Street Station
A
C
E
2
3
4
5
J
Z
Approx. 2–4 minute walk
Park Place Station
2
3
Approx. 3-5 minute walk
Wall Street Station
2
3
Approx. 5-7 minute walk
Chambers Street Station
J
Z
Approx. 5-7 minute walk