New York City Failure to Yield Accident Lawyer
You were already in the intersection. You were driving on the through street. You were crossing in the crosswalk. Or you were simply moving with traffic when another vehicle pulled out in front of you.
Then comes the argument: who was supposed to wait?
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. represents people injured in failure-to-yield accidents throughout New York City. We investigate the traffic controls, movements, timing, sight lines, video, witnesses, and physical evidence that can establish who had the right of way—and why another driver’s decision to proceed resulted in a collision.
- Motor Vehicle Accident Case Results
When someone comes to us after a serious car accident, our focus is on helping them recover the compensation they need to move forward.
$7,000,000
verdict for a client who sustained an injury to her neck requiring surgery due to an automobile accident.
$4,950,000
for a woman struck by a bus resulting in brain injury and disability.
$4,650,000
at trial for a client who was a back seat passenger in South Carolina when a bus driver fell asleep and pushed the plaintiff’s vehicle off of the road.
Failure to Yield Is Really a Decision Made Before the Crash
A failure-to-yield accident occurs when a driver proceeds even though another vehicle, pedestrian, or cyclist has the right of way. The collision may happen at a traffic light, stop or yield sign, uncontrolled intersection, crosswalk, driveway, parking garage, or during a turn. Determining fault starts by identifying what each road user was doing and which right-of-way rule applied when their paths came into conflict.
Some crashes begin with a driver going too fast.
Others begin with someone looking at a phone.
A failure-to-yield crash often begins with a quieter mistake:
Someone decided it was safe to go.
A driver pulls away from a stop sign.
A vehicle noses out of a parking garage.
Two cars approach an uncontrolled intersection.
A driver turns through a crosswalk.
A vehicle crosses opposing traffic to make a left turn.
The impact comes later. The important decision came first.
New York does not have one universal failure-to-yield rule. Article 26 of the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law establishes different right-of-way rules for intersections, left turns, stop and yield signs, vehicles entering roadways, and other situations. Traffic-signal and pedestrian rules can add further obligations.
That gives us a better way to investigate these accidents than simply asking who hit whom:
What was each person doing before their paths crossed, and who should have waited?
Six Failure-to-Yield Crashes That Look Completely Different
Failure to yield is not one specific accident maneuver. New York’s right-of-way rules apply differently when vehicles meet at an uncontrolled intersection, a driver proceeds from a stop or yield sign, a vehicle enters from a driveway or parking area, someone turns across approaching traffic, or a driver encounters a pedestrian or cyclist with the right of way.
Two drivers can both be accused of “failure to yield” even though their crashes have almost nothing else in common.
That is because right of way depends on where people are coming from and what they are trying to do.
1. Two Vehicles Meet at an Uncontrolled Intersection
No traffic light.
No stop sign.
Two vehicles approaching from different streets.
Who yields?
Under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1140, a driver approaching an intersection must yield to a vehicle that has already entered from another highway. When two vehicles enter from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver on the left generally must yield to the driver on the right.
A dispute that sounds like “we got there at the same time” may therefore become a very precise question about who entered first and how close together the vehicles actually were.
2. A Driver Stops—and Then Pulls Out Anyway
A complete stop does not create an automatic right to proceed.
New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 requires a driver who has stopped to yield to a vehicle already within the intersection or approaching closely enough to constitute an immediate hazard while the driver moves across or within it.
The driver can therefore obey the stop sign perfectly and make the dangerous decision afterward.
3. A Driver Proceeds Through a Yield Sign
A yield sign does not necessarily require every vehicle to stop.
It requires the driver to slow appropriately, assess the conflict, and stop when necessary to yield.
Section 1142 requires a driver approaching a yield sign to yield to pedestrians legally crossing and to vehicles within the intersection or approaching closely enough to constitute an immediate hazard.
The statute goes further: when a driver passes a yield sign without stopping and then collides with a pedestrian in a crosswalk or a vehicle in the intersection, the collision is prima facie evidence of failure to yield.
4. A Vehicle Comes Out of a Driveway, Garage, or Parking Area
This scenario happens throughout a city filled with parking garages, lots, loading areas, gas stations, businesses, and curb cuts.
You are already traveling on the street.
Another vehicle emerges from private property and enters your path.
New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1143 requires a driver entering or crossing a roadway from a place other than another roadway to yield to vehicles approaching on the roadway being entered or crossed.
5. A Driver Turns Across Approaching Traffic
A left turn creates its own right-of-way problem because the turning vehicle crosses the path of traffic moving in the opposite direction.
Distance, speed, green lights, protected arrows, and the moment the driver commits to the turn can all become important.
We examine those issues in detail in our <a href=”/new-york-city/left-turn-accident-lawyer/”>New York City Left-Turn Accident Lawyer</a> resource rather than duplicating them here.
6. A Driver Turns Across a Pedestrian or Cyclist’s Path
Failure to yield is not exclusively a car-versus-car problem.
Drivers turning through intersections can cross directly through crosswalks and bicycle travel paths.
New York law separately requires drivers to exercise due care to avoid colliding with pedestrians and bicyclists. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146 also establishes specific consequences when failure to exercise due care causes physical or serious physical injury to a pedestrian or cyclist.
These six scenarios share a label.
They do not share the same legal analysis.
“But I Stopped at the Stop Sign.”
Stopping at a stop sign does not automatically give a driver the right to proceed. After stopping, New York law requires the driver to yield to vehicles already within the intersection or approaching closely enough to constitute an immediate hazard. A driver can therefore stop completely and still cause an accident by entering before it is safe.
Imagine a driver reaches a stop sign.
The car stops completely.
The driver looks left.
Looks right.
Then pulls directly into the path of a vehicle approaching on the through street.
Was the stop legal?
Perhaps perfectly.
Was the decision to proceed safe?
That’s an entirely different question.
This distinction can matter when witnesses focus heavily on whether someone “blew the stop sign.”
Maybe the driver did.
But even if the driver didn’t, the investigation is not over.
The important evidence may establish what the driver could see and what traffic was approaching when the vehicle began moving again.
You Were Already in the Intersection. Does That Matter?
Yes. A vehicle’s position before a collision can be important to determining right of way. At an uncontrolled intersection, New York law generally requires an approaching driver to yield to a vehicle that has already entered from another highway. Stop signs, yield signs, traffic signals, and turning movements can create different obligations, so the entire sequence must be considered.
Picture the crash backward.
At impact, two vehicles occupy the same part of the roadway.
A second earlier, their paths are converging.
Another second back, one vehicle may already be inside the intersection while the other is entering.
Go back another moment and the collision may still be avoidable.
Right of way lives in that sequence.
Not in a photograph taken twenty minutes later.
This is why the location of the damage, final vehicle positions, debris, video, witness accounts, traffic controls, and other evidence can become more meaningful when considered together.
The collision tells us where the vehicles met.
The sequence tells us how they got there.
“They Said I Came Out of Nowhere.”
A driver’s claim that another road user “came out of nowhere” should be tested against the physical environment and available evidence. Sight lines, distance, speed, lighting, obstructions, video, traffic controls, and the amount of time the other road user was potentially visible can help determine what the driver could reasonably have seen before proceeding.
Vehicles do not appear from nowhere.
Neither do pedestrians or bicycles.
They approach from somewhere.
When visibility becomes part of a failure-to-yield dispute, the street itself can become evidence.
Was a delivery truck blocking the corner?
Did parked vehicles restrict the driver’s sight line?
Was scaffolding present?
Did construction equipment obstruct the view?
Was glare affecting visibility?
How far down the street could someone actually see from the driver’s position?
Could the driver have moved forward cautiously and obtained a better view before entering?
Sometimes an obstruction genuinely explains why another road user was difficult to see.
But that can create another question rather than ending the inquiry:
If the driver could not tell whether the path was clear, what made it safe to proceed?
How Do You Prove Who Was Supposed to Yield?
Proving a failure-to-yield accident usually requires reconstructing the road users’ movements before impact. Video, witnesses, traffic controls, photographs, vehicle damage, roadway evidence, electronic vehicle information, sight lines, speed, and accident reconstruction may help establish who entered first, what each person could see, and whether someone proceeded when another road user had the right of way.
There is no single document called “proof of right of way.”
The case is assembled from what the collision left behind.
The Street
Photograph the intersection, not merely the wrecked cars.
Traffic signs, signal heads, stop lines, crosswalks, lane arrows, bicycle facilities, sight obstructions, and roadway geometry can explain the choices each driver faced.
The Cameras Nobody Thought About
Do not assume there was—or wasn’t—a camera.
Useful footage may come from a storefront, apartment building, parking garage, office lobby, bus, taxi, rideshare vehicle, delivery vehicle, dashcam, doorbell camera, or another driver.
A camera does not even have to capture the impact.
Footage showing a vehicle approaching seconds earlier may help establish movement, timing, or speed.
The Person Waiting for the Bus
An independent witness may have seen something neither driver remembers clearly.
One person may know who entered first.
Another may have watched the vehicle leave the stop sign.
<p”>Someone standing at the corner may remember the signal.
Their viewing angle may be completely different from either driver’s.
The Vehicles
Damage is not a verdict.
But impact location, direction of force, final resting positions, debris, and other physical evidence can help test whether the drivers’ accounts make sense.
The Data
In an appropriate case, electronic vehicle information may add evidence concerning speed, braking, or other events around the collision.
No single source has to tell the whole story.
The strongest cases often emerge when several independent pieces of evidence tell the same one.
What If Both Drivers Swear They Had the Right of Way?
Conflicting driver accounts do not necessarily make fault impossible to determine. Traffic controls, video, independent witnesses, vehicle damage, roadway evidence, signal information, and the vehicles’ pre-impact movements can provide evidence that does not depend entirely on either driver’s recollection.
Two people can remember a violent event differently.
And two people with competing insurance claims can certainly tell different stories about it.
Either way, the answer is not to choose whichever driver sounds more confident.
Look for evidence that has no reason to take sides.
A stop sign does not change its story.
Lane markings do not have an insurance claim.
Video does not care who gets blamed.
A witness with no connection to either driver may have no reason to favor one account.
Physical damage may make one version considerably more plausible than another.
A disputed failure-to-yield case does not always have to remain:
Your word against theirs.
Sometimes the most useful witness isn’t a person.
New York City Is Literally Redesigning Intersections to Make Drivers Yield More Safely
New York City uses street design to reduce dangerous turning and yielding conflicts, particularly between drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. NYC DOT’s Turn Calming Program changes intersection geometry to slow turning vehicles and improve visibility. As of the end of 2025, the agency reported turn-calming treatments at 1,236 intersections citywide.
New York City’s response to failure-to-yield crashes is written into the streets themselves.
Rubber curbs.
Bollards.
Slow-turn wedges.
Hardened centerlines.
Bike-island channelization.
Median extensions.
These treatments physically change how drivers move through an intersection.
NYC DOT says its Turn Calming Program grew out of an action plan addressing failure-to-yield crashes caused by left-turning vehicles. By December 31, 2025, treatments had been installed at 1,236 intersections citywide.
The results help explain why intersection geometry matters.
At treated locations, NYC DOT reports:
pedestrian injuries decreased 18%;
pedestrian severe injuries decreased 33%;
median left-turn speeds decreased 54.3%; and
85th-percentile left-turn speeds decreased 59.8%.
In 2025, NYC DOT also announced a new hardened-daylighting design intended to improve visibility among pedestrians, cyclists, and turning vehicles at selected high-crash intersections. The agency noted that roughly half of all New York City traffic fatalities occur at intersections.
The lesson for an accident investigation is bigger than any individual design treatment.
Yielding is not merely knowing a traffic rule.
A driver has to see the conflict, understand it, judge the available time and space, and make the decision not to proceed when proceeding is unsafe.
New York City is redesigning intersections because those decisions have real consequences.
The Five Seconds Before Impact May Tell You More Than the Five Minutes After
Failure-to-yield cases often turn on a very short pre-crash timeline: when each road user became visible, when a driver began moving, how quickly their paths were converging, when danger became apparent, and whether anyone had enough time to avoid the collision. Reconstructing those seconds can reveal far more about fault than looking only at the aftermath.
Imagine a car waiting to enter an avenue.
Five seconds before impact: another vehicle is approaching.
Four seconds: the waiting driver begins moving.
Three seconds: their paths are now in conflict.
Two seconds: the approaching driver recognizes the danger.
One second: braking or evasive steering begins.
Impact.
A real collision may unfold faster or slower.
But afterward, everyone sees the same thing:
Two damaged vehicles sitting in an intersection.
The liability story may have happened almost entirely before either vehicle was damaged.
That’s why distance cannot be considered without speed.
Speed cannot be considered without visibility.
Visibility cannot be considered without timing.
And reaction cannot be judged fairly without asking when the danger actually became apparent.
A photograph freezes the ending.
The investigation has to recover the sequence.
“You Had the Right of Way. Why Didn't You Avoid the Crash?”
Having the right of way does not make every other fact irrelevant, but neither does hindsight establish that a collision was reasonably avoidable. An insurer alleging that an injured driver should have stopped or swerved should consider when the hazard became apparent, the vehicles’ speed and distance, available reaction time, braking distance, surrounding traffic, and whether an evasive maneuver was realistically available.
This is where the conversation can suddenly turn.
The insurer’s driver pulled out.
The evidence may even establish that your vehicle had the right of way.
Then the questions begin:
Why didn’t you brake sooner?
Why didn’t you swerve?
How fast were you going?
When did you first see the car?
Couldn’t you have done something?
Those questions can be legitimate.
The way they are asked can also make a collision seem much easier to avoid than it was.
A person reviewing a claim months later can pause video.
Rewind it.
Measure distances.
Study photographs.
Think for ten minutes about what someone should have done in two seconds.
The person behind the wheel did not have that luxury.
An approaching driver may also initially have every reason to expect another motorist to obey a stop sign, yield sign, traffic signal, or right-of-way rule.
The real question is therefore not:
Can we imagine some maneuver that might have prevented the crash?
It is:
When the danger became reasonably apparent, did the driver actually have enough time, distance, and opportunity to avoid it?
That question belongs in real time.
Not slow motion.
Shared Fault Matters More Under New York's Current Motor Vehicle Rule
Shared responsibility can materially affect a New York motor vehicle injury claim. Under the current 2026 version of CPLR § 1411, a claimant in a personal injury action subject to Article 51 of the Insurance Law is barred from recovery when the claimant’s culpable conduct is greater than that of the person—or combined persons—from whom recovery is sought. Otherwise, claimant fault can reduce recoverable damages.
That makes allegations against the injured person worth investigating seriously rather than dismissing as insurance-company noise.
Was the approaching driver speeding?
Distracted?
Ignoring a signal?
Driving without required lights?
Did another vehicle contribute to the collision?
Were several people’s actions involved?
Under the current version of New York CPLR § 1411, those questions can have substantial consequences in personal injury actions subject to Article 51 of the Insurance Law.
A right-of-way violation may tell us a great deal about why the collision happened.
It should not prevent us from investigating everything else that happened too.
The Most Important Evidence May Be the First Evidence to Disappear
Evidence concerning right of way can disappear quickly. Private surveillance may be overwritten, witnesses become difficult to locate, vehicles are repaired or salvaged, and temporary obstructions such as delivery trucks or construction equipment move. Early preservation is especially valuable when fault depends on timing, visibility, or what a driver could see before proceeding.
The stop sign will probably still be there next month.
The delivery truck blocking it won’t.
The intersection will probably still exist next year.
The store’s surveillance recording may not exist next week.
The traffic light will keep changing red, yellow, and green.
The stranger who watched the crash while waiting for a bus may never stand on that corner again.
This is one of the strange realities of failure-to-yield cases.
The permanent things are often the easiest evidence to find later.
The temporary things can be the evidence that explains what actually happened.
If visibility is disputed, document what was blocking the view.
If a camera may have captured the approach, identify it before the recording disappears.
If someone witnessed who entered first, find out who that person is.
A legal claim can survive for a considerable period.
Evidence doesn’t necessarily share that lifespan.
What Should You Actually Do After a Failure-to-Yield Crash?
After a failure-to-yield accident, prioritize medical care and immediate safety. Report the collision when required and, when possible, preserve photographs, witness information, traffic controls, vehicle positions, potential camera locations, and temporary sight obstructions. Avoid guessing about speed, distance, timing, or fault, particularly when injuries are serious or the drivers disagree about what happened.
If you are seriously injured, getting medical care matters more than becoming your own accident investigator.
But if circumstances permit—or someone else can safely help—try to preserve the things most likely to answer the right-of-way dispute later:
- photograph the vehicles and their damage;
- step back far enough to photograph the entire intersection;
- capture stop signs, yield signs, traffic lights, crosswalks, lane arrows, and stop lines;
- document where the vehicles came to rest;
- get names and contact information for witnesses;
- look for cameras on nearby businesses, buildings, garages, buses, and vehicles;
- photograph temporary obstructions that may affect visibility.
And resist the pressure to manufacture precision.
If you do not know whether you were 60 feet or 100 feet from the intersection, don’t guess.
If you do not know whether three seconds or five seconds passed, don’t invent a number.
If you did not see exactly where the other vehicle came from, say so.
A careful investigation can sometimes recover facts that a person experiencing a sudden collision could never reasonably be expected to memorize.
Why Injured New Yorkers Trust Us
1.
Decades of NYC Personal Injury Experience
For more than 70 years, our firm has represented injured New Yorkers in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. We understand how insurance companies evaluate claims and how to build cases that withstand scrutiny.
2.
Handling Complex NYC Car Accident Cases
Our attorneys represent victims injured in car accidents, truck collisions, rideshare crashes, pedestrian accidents, bicycle accidents, hit-and-run collisions, and other serious traffic-related incidents throughout New York City.
3.
Downtown Manhattan Office Serving All Five Boroughs
Located in Lower Manhattan, our office is easily accessible from throughout New York City. We represent clients across Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island and can move quickly to preserve evidence after a serious crash.
4.
Proven Results In Serious Injury Cases
Our attorneys have secured significant verdicts and settlements in cases involving automobile accidents, pedestrian injuries, truck collisions, bus crashes, and other catastrophic injury matters throughout New York.
5.
No Fee Unless We Recover Compensation
We handle car accident cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no legal fees unless we recover compensation on your behalf.
Meet Our New York City Car Accident Attorneys
For decades, the attorneys at Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput have represented individuals and families throughout New York City in serious personal injury and motor vehicle accident cases. Our legal team combines extensive courtroom experience, strategic case preparation, and a commitment to personalized client service to help accident victims pursue the compensation they deserve.
Michael Jaffe
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Representing injured car accident victims throughout New York City.
Matthew J. Fein
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Helping clients pursue compensation after serious motor vehicle accidents.
Eugene Gozenput
Partner
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT LITIGATION
Advocating for injury victims throughout Manhattan and the five boroughs.
Frequently Asked Questions About New York City Failure-to-Yield Accidents
Failure-to-yield crashes can leave surprisingly complicated questions behind. Who had the right of way may depend on where the vehicles were, what traffic controls applied, whether someone had already entered the intersection, and what each driver could reasonably see before proceeding. Here are answers to some of the questions injured New Yorkers commonly have after these accidents.
Is the driver who failed to yield automatically at fault?
Short answer: Not automatically in every case, but violating the right-of-way rule that applies to the collision can be highly important to determining fault.
The investigation should identify the applicable traffic control or yielding rule, determine whether it was violated, and consider whether any conduct by another road user also contributed to the crash.
Who has the right of way at an intersection with no signs or traffic lights?
Short answer: At an uncontrolled intersection, a driver generally must yield to a vehicle that has already entered from another highway. When two vehicles enter from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver on the left generally yields to the driver on the right.
Timing and the vehicles’ actual movements therefore matter.
Does stopping at a stop sign give a driver the right of way?
Short answer: No.
Stopping satisfies the obligation to stop. The driver must still yield to traffic that has the right of way before proceeding.
Do you always have to stop at a yield sign?
Short answer: No, but you must slow appropriately and stop when necessary to yield.
A driver approaching a yield sign must assess pedestrians and vehicle traffic before proceeding.
Who has the right of way when a car pulls out of a parking garage or driveway?
Short answer: New York law generally requires a vehicle entering or crossing a roadway from a place other than another roadway to yield to vehicles approaching on the roadway being entered or crossed.
The same issue can arise at parking lots, gas stations, loading areas, and other private entrances.
Can a driver fail to yield even if the light is green?
Short answer: Yes.
A green signal authorizes particular movements but does not erase every right-of-way obligation. Turning traffic, for example, may still have to yield to traffic or pedestrians lawfully within an intersection or crosswalk.
What if the other driver says they never saw me?
Short answer: That does not end the fault analysis.
The investigation should determine whether you were visible, how long you were potentially visible, whether something obstructed the driver’s view, and whether the driver should have waited before proceeding.
What if something blocked the other driver's view?
Short answer: An obstruction can explain limited visibility, but it can also raise questions about whether proceeding without a clear view was safe.
Photographs, video, measurements, witness accounts, and the intersection layout can help reconstruct what the driver could actually see.
What if there is no video of the accident?
Short answer: Video is helpful but not required to prove a failure-to-yield crash.
Witnesses, traffic controls, vehicle damage, photographs, roadway evidence, electronic vehicle information, police observations, and accident reconstruction may provide other ways to establish what happened.
Does a failure-to-yield ticket prove my case?
Short answer: A citation can be relevant, but the underlying evidence is more important than relying on the ticket alone.
An injury claim should establish how the collision occurred, which right-of-way rule applied, and how the driver’s conduct caused the crash.
What if I had the right of way but could have swerved?
Short answer: Theoretical hindsight is not the same as a reasonably available opportunity to avoid a collision.
The relevant questions include when the danger became apparent, available reaction time and distance, surrounding traffic, braking, and whether the proposed evasive maneuver was actually realistic.
Can a driver fail to yield to a pedestrian or cyclist?
Short answer: Yes.
Traffic signals, crosswalk rules, turning movements, bicycle facilities, and New York’s due-care requirements can create obligations to yield to or avoid pedestrians and cyclists. These cases can involve issues beyond ordinary vehicle-to-vehicle right-of-way disputes.
What if I was partly responsible for the crash?
Short answer: Shared fault can reduce recovery and, under current New York law governing certain motor vehicle personal injury actions, can bar recovery when the claimant’s culpable conduct exceeds that of the person or combined persons against whom recovery is sought.
Because of those consequences, allegations of speeding, distraction, improper movement, or other claimant conduct should be investigated carefully.
What if a taxi, Uber, Lyft, bus, truck, or delivery vehicle failed to yield?
Short answer: The right-of-way analysis still applies, but commercial operation may create additional questions about vehicle ownership, employment, insurance coverage, and available records.
Identifying every potentially responsible party and applicable insurance policy can be particularly important when injuries are severe.
How much is a failure-to-yield accident claim worth?
Short answer: There is no standard settlement value.
The injuries, medical evidence, lost income, future limitations, fault allocation, insurance coverage, and strength of the evidence all affect the value of an individual claim.
How soon should I contact a lawyer after a serious failure-to-yield accident?
Short answer: Prompt legal help can be particularly valuable when fault is disputed or evidence may disappear.
An attorney can identify the applicable right-of-way rule, investigate the collision, seek video and witnesses, document temporary conditions, review insurance coverage, and help protect the claim while medical treatment continues.
Somebody Had to Wait. The Evidence Can Help Show Who.
<p”>Maybe the other driver says they stopped.
Maybe they insist they never saw you.
Maybe both of you say you had the right of way.
Those disagreements do not have to be resolved by choosing whichever story sounds better. Traffic controls, video, witnesses, sight lines, vehicle damage, roadway evidence, and the seconds leading to impact may tell a much clearer story.
If you were seriously injured because another driver failed to yield in New York City, Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C. can investigate what happened, determine which right-of-way rules apply, preserve available evidence, and help you understand what comes next.
Talk To Us For FreeServing Accident Victims Throughout New York City From Our Lower Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput represents injury victims throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, and Staten Island from our office at 20 Vesey Street in Lower Manhattan. Conveniently located near multiple major subway lines and transportation hubs, our office is easily accessible to clients across New York City seeking experienced legal representation after a serious accident.
Our Downtown Manhattan Office
Pazer Epstein Jaffe Fein & Gozenput, P.C.
20 Vesey Street, Suite 700
New York, NY 10007
917-983-2343
Our firm is located in downtown Manhattan, just steps from major subway lines serving every borough of New York City. Being based in Lower Manhattan allows us to stay closely connected to the courts, agencies, and neighborhoods where serious personal injury cases are handled, while remaining easy to reach for clients traveling from throughout the city.
Getting to Our Manhattan Office by Subway
Our Lower Manhattan office at 20 Vesey Street is conveniently located near several major subway stations serving Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx. Clients visiting our office can easily reach us using the A, C, E, 2, 3, 4, 5, J, and Z lines, with multiple stations located just a short walk away.
Fulton Street Station
A
C
E
2
3
4
5
J
Z
Approx. 2–4 minute walk
Park Place Station
2
3
Approx. 3-5 minute walk
Wall Street Station
2
3
Approx. 5-7 minute walk
Chambers Street Station
J
Z
Approx. 5-7 minute walk